The article discusses the effects of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on posterior lumbar decompression and stabilization. The study compared patients who received a sham block to those who received ESPB, evaluating the differences in inflammatory biomarkers (neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio), postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and functional recovery. The results showed significant differences between the two groups, with ESPB leading to lower ratios of inflammatory biomarkers, better pain management, and improved functional recovery. Overall, ESPB during spinal surgery was found to have beneficial effects on patients undergoing lumbar decompression and stabilization
Summarised by Mr Mo Akmal – Lead Spinal Surgeon
The London Spine Unit : top day surgery hospital in London
Published article
CONCLUSION: ESPB performance during spinal surgery lowers NRL and PLR ratios 12 h and 24 h after surgery. In addition, ESPB provides better analgesia and improves functional recovery compared to sham block following posterior lumbar decompression and stabilization.
Lumbar Decompression Surgery Expert. Best Spinal Surgeon UK
Eur Spine J. 2023 Sep 5. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07913-z. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTPURPOSE: Neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are the inflammatory biomarkers of the stress response. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on posterior lumbar decompression and stabilization by comparing NLR, PLR, postoperative pain, opioid,
Eur Spine J. 2023 Sep 5. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07913-z. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are the inflammatory biomarkers of the stress response. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on posterior lumbar decompression and stabilization by comparing NLR, PLR, postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and functional recovery between sham block and ESPB.
METHODS: This was a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial in a tertiary referral hospital. Sixty patients were randomized into two equal groups, each receiving either a sham block or ESPB. The primary outcome was the NLR and PLR 12 h and 24 h after lumbar posterior decompression and stabilization. The secondary outcomes were total opioid consumption and pain score 24 h postoperatively. Also, functional recovery determined by getting out of bed, verticalization, and walking by the balcony were reviewed as secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: Significant differences existed between the sham block and ESPB group in NLR (29.08 ± 12.29 vs. 16.97 ± 10.38; p < 0.0001) and PLR (556.77 ± 110.32 vs. 346.43 ± 117.34; p < 0.0001) 12 h after surgery. Also, there was a significant difference in NLR (p = 0.0466) and PLR (p < 0.0001) 24 h after surgery. In addition, there was a substantial difference in pain score, total opioid consumption, and functional recovery.
CONCLUSION: ESPB performance during spinal surgery lowers NRL and PLR ratios 12 h and 24 h after surgery. In addition, ESPB provides better analgesia and improves functional recovery compared to sham block following posterior lumbar decompression and stabilization.
PMID:37668689 | DOI:10.1007/s00586-023-07913-z
The London Spine Unit : top day surgery hospital in London
Read the original publication:
The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) levels following erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in posterior lumbar decompression: a randomized, controlled trial