Menu
Menu
19 Harley St, London, W1G 9QJ, UK
We are London's Top Spine Clinic

Spinal Deformity Correction in Marfan Syndrome versus Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Learning from the Differences.

Related Articles

Spinal Deformity Correction in Marfan Syndrome versus Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Learning from the Differences.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Mar 15;

Authors: Gjolaj JP, Sponseller PD, Shah SA, Newton PO, Flynn JM, Neubauer PR, Marks MC, Bastrom TP

Abstract
ABSTRACT: Study Design. Retrospective case control study.Objective. To compare patients with Marfan syndrome and matched patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) to illustrate the differences and identify areas for potential surgical improvement.Summary of Background Data. Patients with Marfan syndrome commonly require spinal deformity surgery, but practice guidelines and results are not as established as those for patients with AIS.Methods. We matched 34 adolescents with Marfan syndrome 1:2 with patients with AIS for age, sex, and degree of major deformity. Overall mean age was 14 �± 2 years and mean curves were 51�° thoracic and 46�° lumbar. Mean follow-up was 5.3 and 3.6 years, respectively.Results. The Marfan group had significantly more thoracolumbar kyphosis correction (9.5�° vs. 0.1�°, P = 0.05), significantly more levels fused (12 �± 2 vs. 9 �± 3, P â�¤ 0.01), significantly more fusions to the pelvis (7 vs. 0, P = 0.01), and significantly more correction of sagittal imbalance (2.4 vs. -0.6 cm, P = 0.035). The Marfan group also had more intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks (3 vs. 0, P = 0.01), significantly more instrumentation complications (3 vs. 1, P = 0.007), more reoperations for indications such as fixation failure, distal degeneration, and spine fracture (9 vs. 0, P = 0.01), and lower SRS-22 total (3.9 vs. 4.5, P = 0.01) and partial (P < 0.015) subscores. There were no significant differences between the groups in progression of unfused proximal thoracic curves, blood loss, neurologic deficit, hospital stay, percent correction, or infection rate.Conclusion. Patients with Marfan syndrome differ in several ways from those with AIS: they require more levels of surgical correction, more distal fusion, greater correction of sagittal balance, and more reoperations, and have more intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks and instrumentation-related complications. Knowledge of these differences is important for planning surgery.

PMID: 22426454 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

Share to care...

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Share on google
Google+
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on skype
Skype

What we do...

The Harley Street Hospital

Testimonials

What is London spine unit and How it Works

The London Spine Unit was established in 2005 and has successfully treated over 5000 patients. All conditions are treated.

We treat all spinal disorders

The London Spine Unit specialises in Minimally Invasive Treatments allowing rapid recovery and return to normal function

Trusted by patients worldwide

The London Spine Unit provides the highest quality care to all patients and has VIP services for those seeking exceptional services

What our patients say about us ......

Unknown

I would like to thank Mr Akmal and his team for taking excellent care of me. I was very worried and upset about my injury

Read More »