The article “Minimally Invasive Spinal Decompression in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Application and Progress” reviews the various techniques and advancements in minimally invasive spinal decompression for treating lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The study extensively reviews domestic and foreign literature on the topic and summarizes the advantages, disadvantages, and complications associated with different surgical methods. The current techniques include microscopic bilateral decompression, microendoscopic decompression, percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression, and unilateral biportal endoscopy. Compared to traditional open surgery, minimally invasive spinal decompression techniques can reduce operation time, blood loss, postoperative pain, hospital stay, and treatment costs. However, the article emphasizes the importance of considering individualized treatment plans based on patient symptoms, signs, and imaging manifestations
Summarised by Mr Mo Akmal – Lead Spinal Surgeon
The London Spine Unit : most specialised spine facility in London
Published article
CONCLUSION: The indications of different minimally invasive spinal decompression are different, but there are certain advantages and disadvantages. When patients have clear surgical indications, individualized treatment plans should be formulated according to the symptoms and signs of patients, combined with imaging manifestations.
Lumbar Decompression Surgery Expert. Best Spinal Surgeon UK
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Jul 15;37(7):895-900. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202303110.ABSTRACTOBJECTIVE: To review the application and progress of different minimally invasive spinal decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).METHODS: The domestic and foreign literature on the application of different minimally invasive spinal decompression in the treatment of LSS was extensively,
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Jul 15;37(7):895-900. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202303110.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To review the application and progress of different minimally invasive spinal decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
METHODS: The domestic and foreign literature on the application of different minimally invasive spinal decompression in the treatment of LSS was extensively reviewed, and the advantages, disadvantages, and complications of different surgical methods were summarized.
RESULTS: At present, minimally invasive spinal decompression mainly includes microscopic bilateral decompression, microendoscopic decompression, percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression, unilateral biportal endoscopy, and so on. Compared with traditional open surgery, different minimally invasive spinal decompression techniques can reduce the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative pain of patients, thereby reducing hospital stay and saving treatment costs.
CONCLUSION: The indications of different minimally invasive spinal decompression are different, but there are certain advantages and disadvantages. When patients have clear surgical indications, individualized treatment plans should be formulated according to the symptoms and signs of patients, combined with imaging manifestations.
PMID:37460188 | DOI:10.7507/1002-1892.202303110
The London Spine Unit : most specialised spine facility in London
Read the original publication:
Research progress of different minimally invasive spinal decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis