Menu
Menu
19 Harley St, London, W1G 9QJ, UK
We are London's Top Spine Clinic

Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared to Open Posterior Lumbar Instrumentation and Fusion.

Related Articles

Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared to Open Posterior Lumbar Instrumentation and Fusion.

Asian J Neurosurg. 2017 Oct-Dec;12(4):620-637

Authors: Lee LY, Idris Z, Beng TB, Young TY, Chek WC, Abdullah JM, Hieng WS

Abstract
Introduction: Degenerative spine disease is increasingly common. There are many spinal fusion techniques used to treat degenerative spine disease. This study aims to compare the functional outcome of open versus minimally invasive surgery (MIS) technique in posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion in degenerative spine disease and to evaluate the perioperative outcome and complications between MIS and open surgery.
Materials and Methods: This is an observational cross-sectional study conducted on all degenerative spine disease patients who underwent both methods of posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion from 2010 to 2014 by the Orthopedic and Neurosurgery Department, Sarawak General Hospital. The analyzed variables were method of surgery and the levels involved, demographic data, estimated blood loss, duration of operation, length of hospitalization, visual analog scale of back pain and radicular pain preoperative, postoperative 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and functional outcome.
Results: One hundred and twenty-two patients underwent posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion from 2010 to 2014. Seventy patients were subjected to MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and 52 open TLIF. Total 89 patients underwent single level of lumbar fusion with sixty patients in MIS group and 29 in open surgeries. MIS TLIF has less estimated blood loss and shorter hospitalization and longer operation time compared to open TLIF, which were statistically significance. MIS TLIF has statistically significance better functional outcome based on Oswestry disability index, Modified NASS score, and RAND 36-item Health Survey 1.0 score. Complications such as infection, new onsets of neurological, and dural tear are equal in both methods of surgery.
Conclusion: This study concluded that MIS has better functional outcome compared to open TLIF with shorter hospitalization, faster return to work, and less estimated blood loss.

PMID: 29114274 [PubMed]

Share to care...

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Share on google
Google+
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on skype
Skype

What we do...

The Harley Street Hospital

Testimonials

What is London spine unit and How it Works

The London Spine Unit was established in 2005 and has successfully treated over 5000 patients. All conditions are treated.

We treat all spinal disorders

The London Spine Unit specialises in Minimally Invasive Treatments allowing rapid recovery and return to normal function

Trusted by patients worldwide

The London Spine Unit provides the highest quality care to all patients and has VIP services for those seeking exceptional services

What our patients say about us ......

Spine Fracture patient

Very good procedure and treatment. Thank you. J.L. You May Also Like:Facet joint injections for Treatment of Low Back painPatient suffering from severe disc degenerationCaudal

Read More »