19 Harley St, London, W1G 9QJ, UK

Minimal access versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: meta-analysis of fusion rates

STUDY DESIGN: A quantitative meta-analysis was conducted on published studies reporting fusion rates after open or minimally invasive/mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedures for single or multilevel degenerative disease including stenosis with spondylolisthesis and degenerative disc disease. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to establish benchmark fusion rates for open TLIF and minimally invasive TLIF (mTLIF) based on published studies. A secondary goal was to review complication rates for both approaches. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar fusion for the treatment of degenerative disease has evolved from a purely posterior noninstrumented approach to a combination of anterior and/or posterior surgery with instrumentation. The increasingly popular transforaminal approach has advanced to incorporate minimally invasive spinal techniques. There currently exist no controlled comparisons between open TLIF and mTLIF. METHODS: A Medline search was performed to identify studies reporting fusion rate on open TLIF or mTLIF with instrumentation. A database including patient demographic information, fusion rate, and complication rate was created. Fusion and complication rates were pooled according to whether TLIF was performed with open or minimally invasive technique. Publication bias was assessed with Egger’s test, and adjustments were performed using Duval and Tweedie’s Trim and Fill algorithm. RESULTS: Twenty-three articles were identified that fit inclusion criteria. In each of the 23 studies, TLIF was performed with pedicle fixation and fusion was evaluated using radiograph or computed tomography scan at minimum 6-month follow-up. Overall, the studies included 1028 patients, 46.8% of which were female. The mean age of all patients was 49.7 (range, 38-64.9), and mean follow-up interval for assessment of fusion was 26.6 months (range, 6-46 months). The usage of recombinant bone morphologic protein was higher in the mTLIF group (50% vs. 12%). Mean fusion rate from 16 studies (716 patients) of open TLIF was 90.9%, whereas mean fusion rate from 8 studies (312 patients) of mTLIF was 94.8%. Complication rate was 12.6% and 7.5% for open and mTLIF, respectively. CONCLUSION: Fusion rates for both open and mTLIF are relatively high and in similar ranges. Complication rates are also similar, with a trend toward mTLIF having a lower rate. This analysis provides clear benchmarks for fusion rates in open and mTLIF procedures for spine surgeons

Keywords : Adult,Aged,analysis,Bone Morphogenetic Proteins,drug therapy,epidemiology,Female,Follow-Up Studies,Humans,Incidence,instrumentation,Intervertebral Disc Degeneration,Lumbar Vertebrae,Male,methods,Middle Aged,Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures,Postoperative Complications,secondary,Spinal Fusion,Spinal Stenosis,Spine,Spondylolisthesis,surgery,therapeutic use,Time Factors,Treatment Outcome,, Access,Versus,Open,Transforaminal,Lumbar, pelvic pain specialist london

Date of Publication : 2010 Dec 15

Authors : Wu RH;Fraser JF;Hartl R;

Organisation : Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10021, USA

Journal of Publication : Spine (Phila Pa 1976 )

Pubmed Link : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20581757

The London Spine Unit : Harley Street UK. Specialists in Cutting Edge Technologies for Spinal Surgery

Make an Appointment 

Trustpilot Reviews
Doctify Reviews
Top Doctor Reviews

Minimal access versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion meta-analysis of fusion rates | Best treatment for piriformis syndrome

What our patients say ...

Consultant Spine Surgeon
Consultant Spine Surgeon
Consultant Spine Surgeon

This surgical technique consists of a percutaneous approach for the treatment of small to medium size hernias of the intervertebral disc by laser energy. The main objective is to reduce the intradiscal pressure in the nucleus pulposus

Laser Disc Surgery can be performed under local anaesthetic as a day case at our centre on the prestigious Harley Street.
What is London spine unit and How it Works

The London Spine Unit was established in 2005 and has successfully treated over 5000 patients. All conditions are treated.

treatment of all spinal disorders

The London Spine Unit specialises in Minimally Invasive Treatments allowing rapid recovery and return to normal function

Trusted by patients worldwide

The London Spine Unit provides the highest quality care to all patients and has VIP services for those seeking exceptional services

If you have any emergency Doctor’s need, simply call our 24 hour emergency

Your personal case manager will ensure that you receive the best possible care.

Call Now 

+44 844 589 2020
+44 203 973 8810