Day Case Lumbar Fusion Surgery
The article discusses a study that examined the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of single-level instrumented interbody fusion surgery for severe low back pain. The study, based on data from the national Danish surgical spine database, included 460 patients. The primary outcome, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, improved significantly at the two-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes, including quality of life, pain scores, and patient satisfaction, also showed improvement. The study concludes that patients with severe back-related disability can expect improved physical function and reduced pain after undergoing instrumented lumbar interbody fusion. The study was not funded, and the registration information is available in the national Danish DaneSpine database
Summarised by Mr Mo Akmal – Lead Spinal Surgeon
The London Spine Unit : most established spinal facility in London
Published article
CONCLUSIONS: Patients suffering from severe back-related disability after failed conservative treatment may expect an improvement in physical function and reduced pain after instrumented lumbar interbody fusion.
Lumbar Fusion Surgery Expert. Best Spinal Surgeon UK
Dan Med J. 2023 Aug 15;70(9):A08220508.ABSTRACTINTRODUCTION: Instrumented lumbar fusion has been used as surgical treatment for severe disability with associated low back pain. The overall effect and risks of the most commonly used instrumented lumbar fusion techniques are controversial. The objective of the study was to describe clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing single-level,
Dan Med J. 2023 Aug 15;70(9):A08220508.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Instrumented lumbar fusion has been used as surgical treatment for severe disability with associated low back pain. The overall effect and risks of the most commonly used instrumented lumbar fusion techniques are controversial. The objective of the study was to describe clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing single-level instrumented interbody fusion surgery with either posterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
METHODS: This was a registry-based cohort study on patients from the national Danish surgical spine database – DaneSpine. The primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at two-year follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were the 3-Level European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ5D-3L), a visual analogue scale (VAS) score, patient satisfaction and the rate of intraoperative complications.
RESULTS: The cohort included 460 patients. ODI improved from 48 ± 15 preoperatively to 33 ± 20 at the two-year follow-up (p less-than 0.001). The EQ5D-3L score improved from 0.279 ± 0.311 to 0.542 ± 0.340, the VAS score for leg pain from 60 ± 28 to 40 ± 32 and back pain from 70 ± 20 to 47 ± 30. Patient satisfaction was obtained in 58%; 24% were undecided, whereas 18% were not satisfied with the treatment outcome at their two-year follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients suffering from severe back-related disability after failed conservative treatment may expect an improvement in physical function and reduced pain after instrumented lumbar interbody fusion.
FUNDING: None.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The national Danish DaneSpine registration.
PMID:37622642
The London Spine Unit : most established spinal facility in London
Read the original publication:
Improvement in physical function and reduced pain after instrumented lumbar interbody fusion