The London Spine Unit : top day surgery unit in London
Published article
CONCLUSIONS: FESS compares favorably for risk reduction in SSI following spinal decompression surgeries with similar operative characteristics. As a consequence, FESS may be considered the optimal strategy for minimizing SSI morbidity.
Lumbar Decompression Surgery Expert. Best Spinal Surgeon UK
Spine J. 2023 Jan 25:S1529-9430(23)00018-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.01.009. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Surgical site infections (SSI) are one the most frequent and costly complications following spinal surgery. The SSI rates of different surgical approaches need to be analyzed to successfully minimize SSI occurrence.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to define the rate of SSIs in patients undergoing full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) and then to compare this rate against a propensity score-matched cohort from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.
DESIGN: This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study using a propensity score-matched analysis of prospectively maintained databases.
PATIENT SAMPLE: 1,277 non-instrumented FESS cases between 2015-2021 were selected for analysis. In the non-endoscopic NSQIP cohort we selected data of 55,882 patients.
OUTCOME MEASURES: The occurrence of any SSI was the primary outcome. We also collected any other perioperative complications, demographic data, comorbidities, operative details, history of smoking and chronic steroid intake.
METHODS: All FESS cases from a multi-institutional group that underwent surgery from 2015-2021 were identified for analysis. A cohort of cases for comparison was identified from the NSQIP database using Current Procedural Terminology of non-endoscopic cervical, thoracic, and lumbar procedures from 2015-2019. Trauma cases as well as arthrodesis procedures, surgeries to treat pathologies affecting more than four levels or spine tumors that required surgical treatment were excluded. In addition, non-elective cases, and patients with wounds worse than class 1 were also not included. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative details were analyzed for propensity matching.
RESULTS: In the non-propensity-matched dataset, the endoscopic cohort had a significantly higher incidence of medical comorbidities. The SSI rates for non-endoscopic and endoscopic patients were 1.2% and 0.001%, respectively, in the non-propensity match cohort (p-value < 0.011). Propensity score matching yielded 5,936 non-endoscopic patients with excellent matching (standard mean difference of 0.007). The SSI rate in the matched population was 1.1%, compared to 0.001% in endoscopic patients with an odds ratio 0.063 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.009-0.461, p=0.006) favoring FESS.
CONCLUSIONS: FESS compares favorably for risk reduction in SSI following spinal decompression surgeries with similar operative characteristics. As a consequence, FESS may be considered the optimal strategy for minimizing SSI morbidity.
PMID:36708928 | DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2023.01.009
The London Spine Unit : top day surgery unit in London
Read the original publication: