19 Harley St, London, W1G 9QJ, UK
We are London's Top Spine Clinic

From the operating room to the courtroom: a comprehensive characterization of litigation related to facial plastic surgery procedures.

Related Articles

From the operating room to the courtroom: a comprehensive characterization of litigation related to facial plastic surgery procedures.

Laryngoscope. 2013 Aug;123(8):1849-53

Authors: Svider PF, Keeley BR, Zumba O, Mauro AC, Setzen M, Eloy JA

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Malpractice litigation has increased in recent decades, contributing to higher health-care costs. Characterization of complications leading to litigation is of special interest to practitioners of facial plastic surgery procedures because of the higher proportion of elective cases relative to other subspecialties. In this analysis, we comprehensively examine malpractice litigation in facial plastic surgery procedures and characterize factors important in determining legal responsibility, as this information may be of great interest and use to practitioners in several specialties.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis.
METHODS: The Westlaw legal database was examined for court records pertaining to facial plastic surgery procedures. The term “medical malpractice” was searched in combination with numerous procedures obtained from the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery website.
RESULTS: Of the 88 cases included, 62.5% were decided in the physician’s favor, 9.1% were resolved with an out-of-court settlement, and 28.4% ended in a jury awarding damages for malpractice. The mean settlement was $577,437 and mean jury award was $352,341. The most litigated procedures were blepharoplasties and rhinoplasties. Alleged lack of informed consent was noted in 38.6% of cases; other common complaints were excessive scarring/disfigurement, functional considerations, and postoperative pain.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis characterized factors in determining legal responsibility in facial plastic surgery cases. Several factors were identified as potential targets for minimizing liability. Informed consent was the most reported entity in these malpractice suits. This finding emphasizes the importance of open communication between physicians and their patients regarding expectations as well as documentation of specific risks, benefits, and alternatives.

PMID: 23299988 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]

Share to care...

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest
Share on google
Share on linkedin
Share on skype

What we do...

The Harley Street Hospital


What is London spine unit and How it Works

The London Spine Unit was established in 2005 and has successfully treated over 5000 patients. All conditions are treated.

We treat all spinal disorders

The London Spine Unit specialises in Minimally Invasive Treatments allowing rapid recovery and return to normal function

Trusted by patients worldwide

The London Spine Unit provides the highest quality care to all patients and has VIP services for those seeking exceptional services

What our patients say about us ......

Disc touching the Thecal Sac

My treatment was excellent. Everybody was kind and considerate. Sandra G. You May Also Like:Spine Fracture patientCervical disc protrusionPatient with Paraspinal AtrophyCaudal Epidural + Facet

Read More »