Day Case Lumbar Fusion Surgery
The article evaluates the clinical efficacy and prognosis of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar fusion (ULIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion (MIS-TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases. The researchers collected case-control studies on ULIF and analyzed various outcomes such as operation times, blood loss, length of hospital stay, pain scores, disability index scores, fusion rates, and complications. The meta-analysis of 10 studies with 738 surgical patients showed that ULIF had a longer operation time, lower blood loss and postoperative drainage volume, lower early postoperative pain scores, and shorter hospital stay compared to MIS-TLIF. ULIF was considered less invasive and a viable surgical option for lumbar degenerative diseases with comparable fusion efficiency, superior MacNab rate, and complication rate
Summarised by Mr Mo Akmal – Lead Spinal Surgeon
The London Spine Unit : most experienced day surgery hospital on Harley Street UK
Published article
CONCLUSION: Compared with the MIS-TLIF group, the ULIF group had longer operation time, lower intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume, lower lumbar VAS score in the early postoperative period, and shorter hospital stay. ULIF is less invasive than traditional MIS-TLIF, making it a trustworthy surgical option for lumbar degenerative diseases with comparable fusion efficiency, superior MacNab rate, and complication rate.
Lumbar Fusion Surgery Expert. Best Spinal Surgeon UK
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Aug 25;102(34):e34705. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034705.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and prognosis of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar fusion (ULIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion (MIS-TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases.METHODS: Chinese and English databases were retrieved for the period from database creation to December 31, 2022. Case-control studies on unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar,
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Aug 25;102(34):e34705. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034705.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and prognosis of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar fusion (ULIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion (MIS-TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases.
METHODS: Chinese and English databases were retrieved for the period from database creation to December 31, 2022. Case-control studies on unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar fusion were collected. The observation indexes consisted of operation times, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain score, postoperative oswestry disability index score, postoperative MacNab excellent and good rate, imaging fusion rate at the last follow-up, and complications. The NO rating table was employed to assess the quality of the included literature, and a meta-analysis was conducted using Revman5.4.1 and Stata17.
RESULTS: Ten studies with 738 surgical patients were considered, including 347 patients in the ULIF group and 391 in the MIS-TLIF group. This Meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant differences in mean operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, length of hospital stay, and early postoperative (1-2W) visual analogue scale/score (VAS) scores for back pain. No significant differences were observed in the final follow-up postoperative VAS scores for back pain, postoperative leg VAS score, postoperative oswestry disability index score, excellent and good rate of postoperative modified MacNab, imaging fusion rate, and complications.
CONCLUSION: Compared with the MIS-TLIF group, the ULIF group had longer operation time, lower intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume, lower lumbar VAS score in the early postoperative period, and shorter hospital stay. ULIF is less invasive than traditional MIS-TLIF, making it a trustworthy surgical option for lumbar degenerative diseases with comparable fusion efficiency, superior MacNab rate, and complication rate.
PMID:37653732 | DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000034705
The London Spine Unit : most experienced day surgery hospital on Harley Street UK
Read the original publication:
Comparison of efficacy between unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis