Comparison of deliverable IMRT and VMAT for spine metastases using a simultaneous integrated boost.
Br J Radiol. 2013 Feb;86(1022):20120466
Authors: Lee YK, Bedford JL, McNair HA, Hawkins MA
OBJECTIVE: To effectively treat spine metastases, significant dose must be delivered to regions surrounding the spinal cord. We present a study comparing both step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques to deliver a concomitant hypofractionated prescription dose to the diseased region and to the involved vertebrae.
METHODS: Seven-field IMRT and a single arc VMAT were inversely planned on five (two cervical and three thoracic) spinal metastatic patients. Planning target volumes PTVm (macroscopic) and PTVe (elective involved vertebrae) and associated organs at risk were localised. Mean doses of 35?Gy to PTVm and 20?Gy to PTVe were prescribed in five fractions. Dose statistics, estimated delivery time and results of verification using Delta(4) (ScandiDos, Uppsala, Sweden) were compared.
RESULTS: Deliverable plans were achieved with both IMRT and VMAT. The coverage to PTV was similar for both IMRT and VMAT (p=0.5) and the dose to the regions adjacent to the spinal cord was 1% higher with VMAT (p=0.04). The mean delivery time for VMAT was 3.5?min compared with 10.5?min for IMRT. Fewer monitor units were required to deliver IMRT than to deliver VMAT. The median (range) percentage of measured points with a ?-index <1 with 3%/3?mm was 100 (99.9-100)% for IMRT and 100 (88.5-100)% for VMAT.
CONCLUSION: Both VMAT and IMRT can deliver the concomitant hypofractionated regime proposed, and both offer different benefits in dose delivery. IMRT is currently preferred for its superior pre-treatment verification results and shorter planning times. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study explores the feasibility of delivering tumouricidal doses of radiation to metastatic spine disease in the vicinity of the spinal cord.
PMID: 23385999 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]