Related Articles |
Comparability between posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the therapy of lumbar degenerative ailments:a scientific overview and meta-analysis.
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jan 21;:
Authors: Lan T, Hu SY, Zhang YT, Zheng YC, Zhang R, Shen Z, Yang XJ
Summary
BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to check the efficacy and security within the administration of lumbar ailments carried out by both posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Interbody fusion was thought-about as “gold commonplace” within the therapy of lumbar degenerative ailments. Each PLIF and TLIF have been advocated and it stays controversial as to the very best operative method.
METHODS: The digital databases together with Embase, PubMed and Cochrane library had been searched to establish related research as much as September 2017. The first outcomes had been fusion price, issues, and scientific satisfaction. The secondary outcomes had been size of hospitalization, operation time, blood loss, postoperative VAS, ODI and JOA. Knowledge evaluation was carried out with RevMan 5.three software program.
RESULTS: A complete of 16 research involving 1502 sufferers (805 sufferers in PLIF group and 697 in TLIF group) had been included within the meta-analysis. The pooled evaluation confirmed that there was no vital distinction by way of fusion price (p>zero.05) and scientific satisfaction (p>zero.05) between two teams. TLIF was superior to PLIF with considerably decrease incidence of nerve root damage (p<zero.05) and dural tear (p<zero.05). Nevertheless, there was no vital distinction concerning wound an infection (p>zero.05) and graft malposition (p>zero.05). PLIF required vital longer operation time (p<zero.05) and extra blood loss (p<zero.05). Though TLIF was related to higher postoperative VAS, ODI and JOA than PLIF, there was no statistical distinction concerning these outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: The obtainable proof means that each TLIF and PLIF might obtain comparable scientific satisfaction and fusion price within the administration of degenerative lumbar ailments. Nevertheless, TLIF was superior to PLIF with shorter operation time, much less blood loss, and decrease incidence of nerve root damage and dural tear. There is no such thing as a vital distinction between each teams concerning wound an infection and graft malposition.
PMID: 29367001 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]