19 Harley St, London, W1G 9QJ, UK

Bacterial wound contamination during simple and complex spinal procedures. A prospective clinical study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Spinal procedures have a potential of intraoperative contamination. C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) have been used to diagnose postoperative infections after spinal surgery. However, it has not been demonstrated if there is an association between surgical site contamination and clinical manifestation of postoperative infection based on inflammatory markers and patients’ clinical course. PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the association between surgical site contamination and the development of a postoperative infection in simple and complex surgical procedures. C-reactive protein and ESR levels were observed. The correlation between their values, surgical time, type of surgical procedures, and contaminated surgical sites was investigated. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. PATIENT SAMPLE: The study consisted of 40 patients divided into two groups. Group A included 20 patients (mean age, 46.2 years; 12 women and 8 men) who underwent an open discectomy for a lumbar herniated disc. Group B consisted of 20 patients (mean age, 67.9 years; 11 women and 9 men) who underwent a decompression and instrumented fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis. They were followed up for an average of 26.7 months (range, 11-40 months). OUTCOME MEASURES: Samples were obtained for cultures in standard time intervals during surgery. The types of bacteria cultured were evaluated, and CRP and ESR levels were measured. METHODS: Simple lumbar discectomy (Group A, 20 patients) and instrumented lumbar decompression for degenerative lumbar stenosis (Group B, 20 patients) were performed in a prospective consecutive series of patients. All patients were operated by the same surgeon in the same operating room. Surgical site preparation in each patient was done by a standard manner. Samples were obtained for cultures in standard time intervals during surgery. C-reactive protein and ESR levels were measured preoperatively on the 3rd, 7th, and 21st postoperative days, and the clinical course of each patient was recorded. RESULTS: From 40 patients, three patients in Group A and five patients in Group B, a total of eight patients (20%) had positive cultures for bacteria. There was no statistical significance between contamination and duration of surgery in both groups. None of the patients with positive intraoperative cultures developed any clinical signs of superficial or deep postoperative spinal infection, and no additional antibiotic treatment was administered. Three patients with negative cultures developed a postoperative infection. There were no differences in CRP and ESR values between patients with contamination and noncontamination in both groups. C-reactive protein and ESR levels were significantly elevated in complex procedures (Group B) than in simple procedures (Group A). Statistical analysis of CRP and ESR values in both groups and types of bacteria cultured intraoperatively are presented. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that intraoperative contamination can occur during simple and complex spinal procedures. In the absence of postoperative signs of infection in patients with intraoperative contamination, there is no need of continuing antibiotic treatment. Postoperative kinetics of CRP and ESR showed to be the same in patients with and without intraoperative contamination. Higher levels of inflammatory markers were noted in complex spinal procedures where instrumentation was applied

Keywords : Adult,adverse effects,Aged,analysis,Bacterial Infections,blood,Blood Sedimentation,C-Reactive Protein,Decompression,Surgical,Diskectomy,epidemiology,etiology,Female,Humans,Infection,instrumentation,Intervertebral Disc Displacement,Kinetics,Lumbar Vertebrae,Male,methods,Middle Aged,Patients,Prospective Studies,Spinal Fusion,Spinal Stenosis,surgery,Surgical Wound Infection,Time,Universities,, Wound,Contamination,During,Simple, best medicine for nerve pain

Date of Publication : 2011 Nov

Authors : Gelalis ID;Arnaoutoglou CM;Politis AN;Batzaleksis NA;Katonis PG;Xenakis TA;

Organisation : Department of Orthopaedics, University of Ioannina, School of Medicine, 11 Pantazidi St, Ioannina 45221, Greece. idgelalis@gmail.com

Journal of Publication : Spine J

Pubmed Link : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22122837

The London Spine Unit : Harley Street UK. Specialists in Cutting Edge Technologies for Spinal Surgery

Make an Appointment 

Trustpilot Reviews
Doctify Reviews
Top Doctor Reviews

Bacterial wound contamination during simple and complex spinal procedures A prospective clinical study | Genitofemoral nerve block side effects

What our patients say ...

Consultant Spine Surgeon
Consultant Spine Surgeon
Consultant Spine Surgeon

This surgical technique consists of a percutaneous approach for the treatment of small to medium size hernias of the intervertebral disc by laser energy. The main objective is to reduce the intradiscal pressure in the nucleus pulposus

Laser Disc Surgery can be performed under local anaesthetic as a day case at our centre on the prestigious Harley Street.
What is London spine unit and How it Works

The London Spine Unit was established in 2005 and has successfully treated over 5000 patients. All conditions are treated.

treatment of all spinal disorders

The London Spine Unit specialises in Minimally Invasive Treatments allowing rapid recovery and return to normal function

Trusted by patients worldwide

The London Spine Unit provides the highest quality care to all patients and has VIP services for those seeking exceptional services

If you have any emergency Doctor’s need, simply call our 24 hour emergency

Your personal case manager will ensure that you receive the best possible care.

Call Now 

+44 844 589 2020
+44 203 973 8810