19 Harley St, London, W1G 9QJ, UK

Assessing the Effects of Publication Bias on Reported Outcomes of Cervical Disc Replacement and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-Epidemiological Study.

Icon for Elsevier Science Related Articles

Assessing the Effects of Publication Bias on Reported Outcomes of Cervical Disc Replacement and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-Epidemiological Study.

World Neurosurg. 2020 Jan 08;:

Authors: Kurian SJ, Wahood W, Alvi MA, Yolcu YU, Zreik J, Bydon M

Abstract
INTRODUCTION: To date, there have been several clinical trials as well as observational studies that have compared the outcomes of different cervical disc replacement (CDR) devices with anterior cervical disc replacement and fusion (ACDF). While the results of these studies have provided sufficient evidence for the safety of CDR, there is still a lack of consensus in terms of longer term outcomes with studies providing equivocal results for the two procedures. In the current study, we utilized a novel methodology, a meta-epidemiological study, to investigate the impact of study characteristics on the observed effects in the published literature on CDR and ACDF.
METHODS: Data was abstracted from available meta-analyses regarding author, study author, year, intervention events, control events, sample size, as well as year and geographical location of each study within the meta-analyses. We grouped the studies based on median year of publication as well as the region of the submitting author(s). Odds ratios (OR), their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), and their standard errors (SE) of individual studies were calculated based on the number of events and sample size for each arm (ACDF or CDR). Further, results of outcomes from individual studies were pooled and a meta-analysis was conducted. Ratio of odds ratio (ROR) was used to assess the impact of each of these factors on estimates of the study for CDR vs ACDF.
RESULTS: A total of 13 meta-analyses were analyzed after exclusions. Using the results from 10 meta-analyses, we found that studies published before 2012 reported significantly lower odds of a reoperation after CDR (vs ACDF), compared to studies published after (ROR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38-0.67, p<0.001). We did not observe a significant impact of study year on difference in estimates between CDR and ACDF for adjacent segment disease (ROR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.64-1.55, p = 0.465). Finally, the region of submitting author was also found to have no impact on results of published studies.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that there may be a publication bias with regards to the year of publication, with earlier studies reporting lower reoperation rates for CDR in comparison to ACDF.

PMID: 31926357 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

Related Articles Assessing the Effects of Publication Bias on Reported Outcomes of Cervical Disc Replacement and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-Epidemiological Study. World Neurosurg. 2020 Jan 08;: Authors: Kurian SJ, Wahood W, Alvi MA, Yolcu YU, Zreik J, Bydon M Abstract INTRODUCTION: To date, there have been several clinical trials as well as…

What our patients say ...

Consultant Spine Surgeon
Consultant Spine Surgeon
Consultant Spine Surgeon

This surgical technique consists of a percutaneous approach for the treatment of small to medium size hernias of the intervertebral disc by laser energy. The main objective is to reduce the intradiscal pressure in the nucleus pulposus

Laser Disc Surgery can be performed under local anaesthetic as a day case at our centre on the prestigious Harley Street.
What is London spine unit and How it Works

The London Spine Unit was established in 2005 and has successfully treated over 5000 patients. All conditions are treated.

treatment of all spinal disorders

The London Spine Unit specialises in Minimally Invasive Treatments allowing rapid recovery and return to normal function

Trusted by patients worldwide

The London Spine Unit provides the highest quality care to all patients and has VIP services for those seeking exceptional services

If you have any emergency Doctor’s need, simply call our 24 hour emergency

Your personal case manager will ensure that you receive the best possible care.

Call Now 

+44 844 589 2020
+44 203 973 8810